Why users are migrating from Apache Druid to StarRocks
NOT ANSI SQL COMPATIBLE
NO JOINED TABLE SUPPORT
NO REAL-TIME UPDATES
DATED ARCHITECTURE
StarRocks vs. Apache Druid
8.9x
4.05x
GREATER PERFORMANCE IN WIDE-TABLE SCENARIOS WITH BITMAP INDEX
3x+
GREATER PERFORMANCE COMPARED TO OTHER LEADING SOLUTIONS
Keep using the tools and languages you love
Why more Druid users are switching to StarRocks
Free yourself from denormalized tables
Embrace mutable data
Scale analytics with ease
Simplify Operations
Compare Apache Druid to StarRocks
Comparison
|
Apache Druid |
StarRocks |
Architecture |
Legacy scatter-gather architecture | Modern MPP architecture |
SQL syntax support |
Only partial SQL syntax support |
Full SQL syntax support |
High-cardinality aggregation performance |
Poor high-cardinality aggregation performance |
Great performance for high-cardinality dimensions |
3rd party dependencies |
Zookeeper-based operations |
No 3rd party dependencies |
Real-time updates |
No real-time updates
|
Real-time updates and deletes |
Distributed joins |
No distributed joins
|
Distributed joins |
Data lake query support |
No data lake query support |
Query support for Hive, Hudi, Iceberg, and Delta |
Support for federated queries |
No support for federated queries |
Federated queries with Hive, MySQL, ES, and JDBC sources |
Featured success stories
Talk to an engineer