What is ANSI SQL and why it matters

Publish date: Aug 1, 2024 3:26:48 PM

What is ANSI SQL?

ANSI SQL (American National Standards Institute Structured Query Language) is a standardized database query language designed to ensure consistent database management and interoperability across various Database Management Systems (DBMS). First established by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1986, it has evolved through multiple versions to accommodate new features and improvements. The goal of ANSI SQL is to provide a uniform set of syntax and rules for database operations, making it easier for developers to use SQL across different platforms without having to learn proprietary extensions.

Why ANSI SQL Matters?

Standardization: ANSI SQL ensures that SQL code written according to the standard can be executed on different DBMS with little or no modifications. This standardization helps avoid vendor lock-in, making it easier for businesses to switch or use multiple database systems simultaneously.
Cross-Platform Interoperability: By adhering to ANSI SQL, developers can write SQL queries that are compatible with major database systems like MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server. This reduces the need to learn the intricacies of each system, facilitating more straightforward migration and integration efforts.
Foundation for SQL Learning: ANSI SQL provides the fundamental constructs that form the basis of SQL. Once you master the standard, extending your knowledge to specific database implementations becomes more manageable.

How ANSI SQL Has Evolved Over Time

The evolution of ANSI SQL (American National Standards Institute Structured Query Language) reflects its development as the standard language for managing and querying relational databases. Here’s an overview of the key milestones in the evolution of ANSI SQL:

1. SQL-86 (SQL-1)

Year: 1986
Significance: The first version of SQL standardized by ANSI and ISO.
Features:
- Basic data definition (CREATE, DROP)
- Data manipulation (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE)
- Simple predicates (WHERE clause)
- Basic set operations (JOINs, UNION)
- No advanced data types or constraints.

Impact: Standardized SQL across multiple database vendors, making SQL a widely adopted language for relational databases.

2. SQL-89

Year: 1989
Significance: A minor revision to the SQL-86 standard, improving consistency and fixing ambiguities.
Features: Mostly clarifications and minor corrections, no major new features were added.

Impact: It helped address some implementation differences between vendors.

3. SQL-92 (SQL-2)

Year: 1992
Significance: A major update to the SQL standard, expanding it significantly.
Features:
- Advanced JOIN types (LEFT, RIGHT, FULL OUTER JOIN)
- Subqueries
- String and date manipulation functions
- Transaction control (START TRANSACTION, COMMIT, ROLLBACK)
- Support for data integrity through constraints (PRIMARY KEY, FOREIGN KEY, UNIQUE)
- Views (virtual tables)
- Set operations (INTERSECT, EXCEPT)
- Support for NULLs.

Impact: SQL-92 became a robust standard adopted by many major database systems, including Oracle, DB2, and SQL Server, making interoperability between systems easier.

4. SQL:1999 (SQL-3)

Year: 1999
Significance: Introduced object-oriented programming features and procedural extensions.
Features:
- User-defined types (UDTs)
- Recursive queries (WITH RECURSIVE)
- Triggers
- Procedural elements (control-flow statements such as IF, CASE, LOOP, etc.)
- SQL-based functions and stored procedures
- Temporary tables.

Impact: The object-oriented capabilities made it possible to model complex data types, and recursive queries enabled handling hierarchical and graph-like data structures.

5. SQL:2003

Year: 2003
Significance: Introduced XML data support and window functions.
Features:
- XML data type and operations (XML support in SQL queries)
- Window functions (e.g., ROW_NUMBER(), RANK(), PARTITION BY, OVER)
- Sequence generators (auto-incrementing values).

Impact: Window functions significantly improved SQL’s ability to handle analytical queries, making it much more powerful for reporting and analytics.

6. SQL:2006

Year: 2006
Significance: Focused mainly on XML-related extensions.
Features:
- More extensive support for working with XML data (XPath, XQuery support).

Impact: XML was still growing as a data exchange format, so this revision enhanced SQL’s ability to handle XML documents within databases.

7. SQL:2008

Year: 2008
Significance: Refined many features and added minor enhancements.
Features:
- New data types (e.g., BIGINT)
- Enhancements to OLAP (online analytical processing) functions.

Impact: Improved SQL for modern business intelligence and analytics use cases.

8. SQL:2011

Year: 2011
Significance: Added time-based data management.
Features:
- Temporal tables (for time-based data management and history tracking)
- Period data types.

Impact: Temporal tables allowed databases to maintain historical data, making SQL more useful for tracking changes over time (e.g., in financial or auditing systems).

9. SQL:2016

Year: 2016
Significance: Added JSON data support and improvements to security features.
Features:
- JSON data type and functions (e.g., JSON_TABLE)
- Row pattern recognition (MATCH_RECOGNIZE for complex event processing).

Impact: Addressed the growing use of semi-structured data by integrating JSON into relational databases, further expanding SQL’s reach into NoSQL-like data handling.

10. SQL:2019

Year: 2019
Significance: Introduced extensions for working with multidimensional arrays and enhanced data processing.
Features:
- Improvements in window functions
- Support for polymorphic table functions
- Enhancements to multidimensional arrays.

Impact: Extended SQL's capabilities for complex analytics, enhancing its usage for data science applications and real-time analytics in large-scale systems.

Current Trends

SQL has continued to evolve in response to the growing demands of data management and analytics, integrating with modern data formats (JSON, XML), supporting complex analytical functions (windowing, recursive queries), and expanding to accommodate new paradigms like big data, distributed systems, and real-time processing.

Future developments are likely to focus on:

Better integration with cloud environments.
Enhanced machine learning support.
More seamless interoperability between SQL and non-SQL data systems (e.g., integration with graph databases and NoSQL).
Further enhancements to support streaming data and event-driven architectures.

Key Components of ANSI SQL

1. Data Definition Language (DDL)

DDL commands are used to define, modify, and remove database objects like tables, indexes, and schemas. The most common DDL statements are CREATE, ALTER, and DROP.

Example: Creating a Table

CREATE TABLE employees (
employee_id INT PRIMARY KEY,
first_name VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
last_name VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
hire_date DATE,
salary DECIMAL(10, 2),
department_id INT,
FOREIGN KEY (department_id) REFERENCES departments(department_id)
);

Explanation:
- CREATE TABLE: Creates a new table called employees.
- employee_id INT PRIMARY KEY: Defines a column for the employee's unique identifier, marked as the primary key.
- first_name VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL: Defines a column for the employee's first name that must be filled (NOT NULL constraint).
- FOREIGN KEY (department_id) REFERENCES departments(department_id): Specifies a foreign key relationship with another table, departments.

Example: Modifying a Table

ALTER TABLE employees ADD email VARCHAR(100);

Explanation: Adds a new column email of type VARCHAR(100) to the existing employees table.

Example: Dropping a Table

DROP TABLE employees;

Explanation: Removes the employees table from the database completely.

2. Data Manipulation Language (DML)

DML commands are used to retrieve and manipulate the data within the database. The most common DML commands are SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE.

Example: Inserting Data into a Table

INSERT INTO employees (employee_id, first_name, last_name, hire_date, salary, department_id)

VALUES (1, 'John', 'Doe', '2022-01-01', 50000.00, 101);

Explanation:
- Inserts a new row into the employees table with the specified values.
- The values provided correspond to the employee_id, first_name, last_name, hire_date, salary, and department_id columns.

Example: Selecting Data from a Table

SELECT first_name, last_name, salary
FROM employees
WHERE department_id = 101
ORDER BY last_name;

Explanation:
- Retrieves first_name, last_name, and salary from all employees in department 101.
- The result set is ordered alphabetically by last_name.

Example: Updating Data in a Table

UPDATE employees
SET salary = salary * 1.10
WHERE department_id = 101;

Explanation:
- Increases the salary of all employees in department 101 by 10%.

Example: Deleting Data from a Table

DELETE FROM employees
WHERE employee_id = 1;

Explanation:
- Deletes the row where the employee_id is 1 from the employees table.

3. Data Control Language (DCL)

DCL commands manage permissions and access control for database objects. The most common commands are GRANT and REVOKE.

Example: Granting Permissions

GRANT SELECT, INSERT ON employees TO user1;

Explanation:
- Grants SELECT and INSERT permissions on the employees table to user1.

Example: Revoking Permissions

REVOKE INSERT ON employees FROM user1;

Explanation:
- Removes the INSERT permission on the employees table from user1, but the user still retains SELECT access.

4. Transaction Control Language (TCL)

TCL commands manage transactions to ensure data integrity. Common TCL commands are BEGIN, COMMIT, and ROLLBACK.

Example: Transaction Management

BEGIN TRANSACTION;

UPDATE employees
SET salary = salary * 1.10
WHERE department_id = 101;

COMMIT;

Explanation:
- The BEGIN TRANSACTION starts a transaction.
- The UPDATE command increases the salary of employees in department 101 by 10%.
- The COMMIT command finalizes the transaction, ensuring the changes are permanently applied to the database.

Example: Rolling Back a Transaction

BEGIN TRANSACTION;

UPDATE employees
SET salary = salary * 1.10
WHERE department_id = 101;

ROLLBACK;  -- Cancel the transaction

Explanation:
- This example begins a transaction, but the ROLLBACK command cancels all changes made within the transaction, restoring the data to its previous state.

ANSI vs. Non-ANSI Joins in SQL: Understanding the Difference

When it comes to writing SQL queries that join two or more tables, there are two distinct approaches: the ANSI standard and the Non-ANSI standard. We'll break down both approaches, explain how they work, and highlight which method is generally considered better for modern SQL development.

ANSI Joins: The Standard Method

ANSI joins are the modern, widely accepted way of writing SQL joins. These joins explicitly use the JOIN keyword along with the ON clause to define the join condition between tables. This approach allows for clearer, more structured SQL queries, making it easier to distinguish between join conditions and filtering conditions.

Example: ANSI SQL Inner Join

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name
FROM employees e
INNER JOIN departments d
ON e.department_id = d.department_id;

Explanation:
- INNER JOIN: Specifies that only rows with matching department_id values from both employees and departments will be returned.
- ON e.department_id = d.department_id: Defines the condition on which the two tables are joined.

In this example, we are fetching the employee names along with the names of the departments they belong to. The use of the INNER JOIN keyword and the ON clause makes the query easy to read and understand.

Example: ANSI SQL Left Join

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name
FROM employees e
LEFT JOIN departments d
ON e.department_id = d.department_id;

Explanation: The LEFT JOIN returns all employees, even if they do not belong to a department. If no match is found in the departments table, the department_name will be NULL.

Non-ANSI Joins: The Legacy Method

Non-ANSI joins are an older way of writing SQL joins, often referred to as "implicit joins." Before the JOIN keyword was introduced, SQL developers would write joins by simply listing the tables in the FROM clause, separated by commas, and then specifying the join condition in the WHERE clause. This method can still be found in legacy systems or older SQL scripts, but it is generally considered outdated and harder to maintain.

Example: Non-ANSI Inner Join

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name
FROM employees e, departments d
WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id;

Explanation: Instead of using the JOIN keyword, the tables are separated by a comma, and the join condition (e.department_id = d.department_id) is placed in the WHERE clause.

While this query will return the same result as the ANSI inner join, the non-ANSI format is harder to read, especially in more complex queries involving multiple joins.

Example: Non-ANSI Left Join (Oracle Syntax)

Non-ANSI joins are particularly tricky when dealing with outer joins. In systems like Oracle, a special syntax using the (+) symbol is required.

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name
FROM employees e, departments d
WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id(+);

Explanation: The (+) symbol indicates that a left outer join should be performed. This query will return all employees, even if they don't have a matching department.

However, this syntax is not supported in many other databases like PostgreSQL or MySQL, making it less portable.

ANSI vs. Non-ANSI Joins: Key Differences

1. Syntax and Readability

ANSI Joins: The join condition is explicitly defined using the JOIN keyword and the ON clause. This separates the join logic from filtering conditions and makes the query more readable.

Example:

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name FROM employees e INNER JOIN departments d ON e.department_id = d.department_id WHERE d.department_name = 'HR';
Non-ANSI Joins: The join condition is mixed with filtering conditions in the WHERE clause. This can make the query harder to read and understand, especially as the complexity increases.

Example:

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name FROM employees e, departments d WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id AND d.department_name = 'HR';

2. Portability Across RDBMS

ANSI Joins: ANSI SQL joins are supported by all major RDBMS, making them highly portable. Whether you're working in MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle, or PostgreSQL, ANSI SQL queries will run consistently.
Non-ANSI Joins: Non-ANSI syntax, especially for outer joins (like the Oracle (+) symbol), is not supported across all databases. For example, PostgreSQL and MySQL do not support this method, which limits the portability of your SQL code.

3. Error Detection and Prevention

ANSI Joins: The explicit use of the JOIN keyword helps prevent accidental cross joins. If you forget to specify a join condition, SQL will throw an error.

Example:

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name FROM employees e INNER JOIN departments d;
- This query will throw an error because the ON clause is missing.
Non-ANSI Joins: If you forget to specify a join condition in a non-ANSI join, SQL will perform a cross join, which can result in an enormous and unintended dataset. This can be a significant issue in larger databases.

Example:

SELECT e.employee_name, d.department_name FROM employees e, departments d;
- This query will return the Cartesian product of both tables, combining every row in employees with every row in departments.

4. Outer Joins Complexity

ANSI Joins: Handling outer joins is simple and consistent in ANSI SQL. You can easily perform LEFT JOIN, RIGHT JOIN, or FULL JOIN with clear syntax.
Non-ANSI Joins: Non-ANSI joins require database-specific syntax (e.g., the Oracle (+) symbol for outer joins), making the code less portable and harder to understand.

Advantages of ANSI Joins

Readability: The clear separation of the join condition (ON clause) and filtering logic (WHERE clause) makes ANSI SQL easier to read, especially for complex queries involving multiple tables and joins.
Error Prevention: ANSI SQL helps prevent cross joins by requiring an explicit join condition. If the join condition is missing, the query will throw an error instead of running incorrectly.
Portability: ANSI SQL is universally supported across all major RDBMS, making your SQL queries more portable and adaptable.
Maintainability: As your queries grow in complexity, ANSI joins provide better structure and are easier to maintain and debug.

While both ANSI and Non-ANSI join syntax will return the same results for basic queries, ANSI joins are considered the best practice in modern SQL development. They provide better readability, error prevention, and portability across database systems, making them more suitable for complex queries and long-term maintenance.

Therefore, if you're writing SQL today or maintaining an existing codebase, it's highly recommended to use ANSI SQL for all join operations.

ANSI SQL FAQ

What is the relationship between ANSI SQL and MySQL?

MySQL is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that implements SQL, following the ANSI SQL standard. However, MySQL also includes several proprietary extensions and features that go beyond ANSI SQL, making it a specific implementation of SQL with additional functionalities.

Does MySQL fully comply with ANSI SQL?

While MySQL adheres to the core principles of ANSI SQL, it does not fully comply with the standard. MySQL implements most of the SQL-92 standard and parts of SQL:1999, SQL:2003, and later versions, but it also has unique features and extensions not found in ANSI SQL, such as additional functions and data types.

How does MySQL differ from ANSI SQL?

MySQL differs from ANSI SQL in several ways:

Proprietary features: MySQL introduces proprietary extensions, such as specific functions (e.g., INET_ATON(), FIND_IN_SET()) and storage engines like InnoDB and MyISAM.
Data types: MySQL supports some data types that aren't part of the ANSI SQL standard (e.g., TINYINT, ENUM).
Handling of NULLs: MySQL may treat NULL values differently than ANSI SQL in certain contexts, such as indexing or aggregation.
Limit and pagination: MySQL uses the LIMIT clause for pagination, while ANSI SQL uses more standardized methods like FETCH FIRST or OFFSET.

Which databases are ANSI SQL-compliant?

Several popular databases are ANSI SQL-compliant, meaning they implement most of the core SQL functionality based on the ANSI standard. These include:

MySQL
PostgreSQL
Oracle Database
Microsoft SQL Server
StarRocks
SQLite

These databases implement the core SQL functionality defined by the ANSI standard while also offering proprietary extensions.

Is it possible to migrate SQL queries between different ANSI SQL-compliant databases?

Yes, one of the main advantages of ANSI SQL compliance is query portability. Basic SQL queries should work across compliant databases with minimal modification. However, if a query uses database-specific extensions or optimizations, some adjustments might be necessary during migration.

Are there differences in performance between ANSI SQL-compliant databases?

While the SQL syntax might be standardized, performance can vary between ANSI SQL-compliant databases due to differences in query optimization, indexing, storage engines, and hardware architectures. For example, while adhering to the ANSI SQL standard, StarRocks offers significant performance optimizations tailored for complex analytical queries. By combining ANSI SQL compliance with enhanced query execution speed, StarRocks enables businesses to use standardized SQL while benefiting from faster query performance in large-scale data environments. This gives StarRocks an advantage for data-intensive workloads without sacrificing SQL portability.

What happens if a database is not ANSI SQL-compliant?

Non-ANSI SQL-compliant databases often introduce their own query languages or syntax extensions, which can limit the portability of SQL queries. These databases may be optimized for specific use cases but may require additional learning or code adjustments when switching between systems.

How does ANSI SQL differ from NoSQL databases?

ANSI SQL is used with relational databases that follow a structured, schema-based approach. In contrast, NoSQL databases handle unstructured or semi-structured data without requiring a predefined schema. However, ANSI SQL has evolved to handle semi-structured data types like JSON, narrowing the gap between the two.

Can you use ANSI SQL in non-relational databases?

No, ANSI SQL is designed specifically for relational databases. However, many modern database systems, including some NoSQL databases, provide SQL-like querying capabilities to offer similar functionality.

How does ANSI SQL handle semi-structured data?

Starting with SQL:2016, ANSI SQL provides support for semi-structured data like JSON. This allows for the storage and querying of data that doesn't fit neatly into relational rows and columns, bridging the gap between traditional SQL and NoSQL databases.

Is ANSI SQL still relevant today?

Yes, ANSI SQL remains highly relevant as it is the foundational query language for relational databases. Over time, it has evolved to support modern data types, analytics functions, and new data formats like JSON and XML, ensuring it remains a crucial tool for data management.

Conclusion

Understanding the key components of ANSI SQL (DDL, DML, DCL, TCL) and the differences between ANSI SQL and proprietary joins is essential for database professionals. ANSI SQL provides a standardized, portable foundation for managing relational databases, while proprietary extensions offer additional functionality and performance optimizations tailored to specific systems. By mastering both, developers can write highly efficient, maintainable, and portable SQL code.

See All Glossary Items

Data Manipulation Language (DML)

SQL Joins

SQL Joins Explained: A Complete Resource

What Really Happens When You Run a SQL Query? A Look into Query Execution

Cassandra Query Language (CQL)